1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2006 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2006 Toyota Aygo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Aygo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Aygo (53 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Aygo should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 40 weights approximately 136 kg more than 2006 Toyota Aygo.
Because 1954 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Aygo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 2006 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | Aygo |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 53 HP |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 81.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 35 L |