1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 305 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Clio |
Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2946 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |