1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (84 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Titan |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 106 L |