1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 207 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 207 (121 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40.
Because 1954 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | A 40 | 207 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 121 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1972 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1397 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |