1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40.
Because 1954 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Megane |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |