1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu

To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40.

Because 1954 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1954 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1954 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Austin A 40 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model A 40 Malibu
Year Released 1954 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 41 HP 169 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4130 mm 4872 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1786 mm
Vehicle Height 1570 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2852 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 61 L