1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (84 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 40 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Austin | Smart |
| Model | A 40 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 1867 mm |
