1954 Austin A 70 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 70.
Because 1954 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 70. (157 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 70.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 70 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 70 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2380 mm |