1954 Austin A 70 vs. 2002 Peugeot Sesame
To start off, 2002 Peugeot Sesame is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 70.
Because 1954 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin A 70 (157 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1954 Austin A 70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 70 | 2002 Peugeot Sesame | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | A 70 | Sesame |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1640 mm |