1954 Austin A 70 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki F1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki F1 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 186 kg more than 1954 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin A 70 (157 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1954 Austin A 70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 70 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Austin | Suzuki |
| Model | A 70 | F1 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 45 L |
