1954 Austin A 70 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 70.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 70. (157 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 70.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 70 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 70 | Colt |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 95 L |