1954 Austin A 90 vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 90. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 90 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 90 | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Austin | Sunbeam |
Model | A 90 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1954 | 1965 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2190 mm |