1954 Austin A 90 vs. 2009 Volvo C70

To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 90. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 90.

Because 1954 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 90. (191 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Austin A 90 2009 Volvo C70
Make Austin Volvo
Model A 90 C70
Year Released 1954 2009
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2660 cc 2519 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 87 HP 227 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 191 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1560 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2650 mm