1954 Austin A 90 vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin A 90 (87 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1954 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 90 | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 90 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2490 mm |