1954 Austin A 90 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin A 90 (87 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1954 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin A 90 (191 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (115 Nm). This means 1954 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 90 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 90 | Aveo |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2525 mm |