1954 Austin A vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1954 Austin A. (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1954 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A | 62 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |
