1954 Austin A vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (248 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1954 Austin A. (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A weights approximately 175 kg more than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A. (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
Model | A | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1954 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 7462 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 248 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 502 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2850 mm |