1954 Austin A vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin A (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin A should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A weights approximately 793 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin A (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1954 Austin A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A | Celica |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1182 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2640 mm |
