1954 Austin A vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1954 Austin A. (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Austin | Caterham |
Model | A | 1700 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 36 L |