1954 Austin A vs. 2001 BMW Compact
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1954 Austin A. (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A weights approximately 395 kg more than 2001 BMW Compact.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin A (287 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Compact. (237 Nm). This means 1954 Austin A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Compact.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A | 2001 BMW Compact | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A | Compact |
Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 63 L |