1954 Austin A vs. 2003 Chevrolet SS
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SS (430 HP) has 300 more horse power than 1954 Austin A. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SS should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A weights approximately 315 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet SS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SS (583 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A. (287 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A | 2003 Chevrolet SS | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A | SS |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 430 HP |
Torque | 287 Nm | 583 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 64 L |