1954 Austin A vs. 2007 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1954 Austin A. (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A. (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A | 2007 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A | STS |
Year Released | 1954 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 3556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 64 L |