1954 Austin A vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A weights approximately 515 kg more than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin A (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (190 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1954 Austin A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Austin | Isuzu |
| Model | A | KB |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 2197 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 94.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 75 L |
