1954 Austin A vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1954 Austin A. (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A weights approximately 375 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando.

Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin A (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. (232 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1954 Austin A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Austin A 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model A Orlando
Year Released 1954 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3992 cc 2384 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 130 HP 174 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 287 Nm 232 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1975 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4652 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1836 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1633 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2760 mm