1954 Austin A vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1954 Austin A. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A weights approximately 400 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Because 1954 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Austin | Kia |
Model | A | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2845 mm |