1954 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1942 Cadillac 61
To start off, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,274 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 61 (123 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey 100. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 61 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1954 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey 100 | 1942 Cadillac 61 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
| Model | 100 | 61 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 5274 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3280 mm |
