1954 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1969 Renault 4
To start off, 1969 Renault 4 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1969 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1969 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin-Healey 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey 100 | 1969 Renault 4 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | 100 | 4 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2410 mm |