1954 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1972 Renault 8
To start off, 1972 Renault 8 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1972 Renault 8. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1972 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey 100 | 1972 Renault 8 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | 100 | 8 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2270 mm |