1954 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1978 Chrysler 160

To start off, 1978 Chrysler 160 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1954 Austin-Healey 100.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 (144 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1954 Austin-Healey 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Austin-Healey 100 1978 Chrysler 160
Make Austin-Healey Chrysler
Model 100 160
Year Released 1954 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2660 cc 1639 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 90 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 144 Nm 133 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 945 kg 1085 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2680 mm