1954 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1998 Rover Mini

To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 249 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin-Healey 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey 100 (144 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 1954 Austin-Healey 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.

Compare all specifications: