1954 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey 100. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey 100.
Because 2006 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Austin-Healey 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1954 Austin-Healey 100 has manual transmission. 1954 Austin-Healey 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey 100 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | 100 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |