1954 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2011 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford S-Max is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford S-Max (160 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey 100. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey 100.
Because 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin-Healey 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford S-Max has automatic transmission and 1954 Austin-Healey 100 has manual transmission. 1954 Austin-Healey 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford S-Max will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey 100 | 2011 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | 100 | S-Max |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |