1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2001 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (193 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 38 kg more than 2001 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Mustang (306 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2001 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Sports Convertible | Mustang |
Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1412 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2840 mm |