1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 42 kg more than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (530 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Sports Convertible | Mustang |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 530 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1492 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |