1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 105 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 175 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Sports Convertible | Clio |
Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2580 mm |