1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1952 Bugatti Type 101
To start off, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 3,257 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Bugatti Type 101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Bugatti Type 101 (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Bugatti Type 101 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 90 kg more than 1952 Bugatti Type 101.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1952 Bugatti Type 101 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Bugatti |
Model | Tickford | Type 101 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3257 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1440 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3310 mm |