1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1966 DKW F 102
To start off, 1966 DKW F 102 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 620 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1966 DKW F 102 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | DKW |
Model | Tickford | F 102 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2480 mm |