1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1971 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1971 Ford Mustang is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,726 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Ford Mustang (251 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 530 kg more than 1971 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Ford Mustang. (146 Nm). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1971 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1971 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2780 mm |
