1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1971 Rover 2000
To start off, 1971 Rover 2000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 235 kg more than 1971 Rover 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1971 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Rover |
| Model | Tickford | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1971 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2640 mm |
