1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1973 MG MGB
To start off, 1973 MG MGB is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1973 MG MGB. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1973 MG MGB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 530 kg more than 1973 MG MGB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1973 MG MGB | |
Make | Austin-Healey | MG |
Model | Tickford | MGB |
Year Released | 1954 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2320 mm |