1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1980 Mazda 626
To start off, 1980 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 485 kg more than 1980 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1980 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | Tickford | 626 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2520 mm |
