1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1986 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1986 Chrysler ES is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 355 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1986 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chrysler |
Model | Tickford | ES |
Year Released | 1954 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2470 mm |