1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1986 Lada 2107
To start off, 1986 Lada 2107 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1986 Lada 2107. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada 2107. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 470 kg more than 1986 Lada 2107. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Lada 2107. (108 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Lada 2107.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1986 Lada 2107 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Lada |
| Model | Tickford | 2107 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1451 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2430 mm |
