1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1987 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
| Model | Tickford | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1987 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2440 mm |
