1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 437 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Jaguar |
| Model | Tickford | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1993 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 642 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 340 mm |
