1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1998 Ford Triton
To start off, 1998 Ford Triton is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Triton (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Triton should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 298 kg more than 1998 Ford Triton.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1998 Ford Triton | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | Triton |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1232 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3520 mm |
