1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 7,253 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (582 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 477 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 520 kg more than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (721 Nm) has 537 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Tickford | ML |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 7253 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 582 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 721 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2520 mm |
