1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 262 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 102 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Tickford | CLK |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 367 HP |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2780 mm |