1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2001 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Covie is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 780 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (178 Nm). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2001 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Suzuki |
Model | Tickford | Covie |
Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1327 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 178 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2010 mm |