1954 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2003 Ford Laser
To start off, 2003 Ford Laser is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 105 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 415 kg more than 2003 Ford Laser.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Laser. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2003 Ford Laser | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | Laser |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2620 mm |
